| CERTAIN things are likely to be
overlooked about the presidential proclamation of a state of
national emergency — 1017. Here are three that deserve
particular attention for their dire consequences:
One, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has withdrawn the
proclamation only nominally; the suppressive spirit behind
it remains. The trick is not unlike the paper lifting of
martial law (1081 in this case) in 1981: Ferdinand Marcos
went on ruling as a dictator for another five years and
would have gone on doing so if he had not been deposed by
People Power.
Two, 1017 has been meant not really as a warning to the
nation of some great danger from rebellious forces (if there
was any serious rebellion, especially involving soldiers,
such as made to appear, surely it would be in the interest
of the government to downplay the idea, lest the general
opposition be emboldened or otherwise inspired); 1017 has
been meant, rather, as a strategic assertion of presidential
power, which has its own dangers.
Three, while its immediate target may have really been
certain disaffected and restive, if not yet rebellious,
soldiers, 1017 also has been intended to set the stage for a
campaign of intimidation against the news media — a campaign
that will put, in the catch phrase of the times, a “chilling
effect” in journalists’ spines. If the news media have been
in fact the chief target, that is no surprise; it falls into
a pattern.
At every chance, Arroyo has expressed her contempt for
certain newspapers and broadcast networks, even stonewalling
them off sometimes. And for what offense? Reporting bad news
— bad news, that is, to her. But how can it be helped during
a presidency plagued by scandals?
And ever alert to her cue, Justice Secretary Raul
Gonzalez, her most aggressive enforcer, has been quick to
seize the first suitable occasion to follow up. At the
height of an international alarm on terrorism last year, for
instance, he warned the media against giving news time or
space to rebel sources.
In turn, the National Telecommunications Commission has
not failed to remind the networks of its power to revoke
broadcast franchises. A quasi-judicial agency, the
commission is supposed to answer only to the superior courts
but, having been put under the administrative supervision of
the Department of Transportation and Communications, it now
comes under the President’s shadow.
At any rate, 1017 would seem the perfect final coup: it
comes down so hard it will retain its intimidating power
even after it has been lifted.
(Vergel O. Santos) |